The Rubber and the Road: A Workbook for Implementing the Codes of
Good Practice
4. Moving forward … on funding
Over the long term, improvements in the sectors’ funding relationship
should result in substantial gains on both sides – including greater
accountability in the funding process, strengthened sustainable capacity
among voluntary sector organizations and more transparency, consistency
and understanding between the sectors. Take some time to rate yourself
or your organization on the selected good practices that follow and
see what areas are most in need of improvement. You may also want to
make a quick assessment of how the other sector is doing on its good
practices.
Once you’ve completed the assessment, go through the questions
suggested below for some ideas about how you can move forward.
A. Good practices for both sectors
(you can use this chart to assess your practices and those of the “other”)
|
|
Couldn't be better |
Needs
Improve-ment |
Starting from scratch |
Doesn't apply |
| Make sure impact assessments of
funding policies and practices consider the varying regional circumstances |
|
|
|
|
| Exchange information, and build
general awareness and understanding |
|
|
|
|
| Make good-quality information available
for decision-making and reporting on results |
|
|
|
|
| Establish collaborative processes
with clearly defined roles and responsibilities – particularly
for decisions about the funding process |
|
|
|
|
| Agree on the outcomes for financial
programs/activities |
|
|
|
|
| Develop evaluation tools to measure
longer-term funding outcomes at the program level (as opposed to
project level) |
|
|
|
|
| Communicate shared results and successes jointly |
|
|
|
|
Ask yourself …
- What types of funding, if any, does your organization provide to/receive
from the “other?”
- What are the major strengths/weaknesses of your funding relationship
– from your perspective and from the other sector’s view?
- If you could change one thing about the funding process, what would
it be?
Some tools to work with …
Check out the following funding information about the two sectors and
consider:
- Whether there are advantages/disadvantages to the voluntary sector
of the various types of funding (contributions, contracts, grants,
etc.)? To the Government of Canada?
- Whether there are any funding arrangements that might better suit
your relationship with the other sector?
What the Government of Canada supports
Each department and agency of the Government of Canada determines the
type(s) of funding best suited to its mandate and policy objectives
– these may include contributions, grants, contracts and other
transfer payments. Although most funding is allocated for a one-year
period, some departments and agencies also provide funding on a multi-year
basis for activities such as:
- program and service delivery
- strengthened sustainable capacity
- strategic investment
- alliances and partnerships
- policy dialogue
- advocacy
- research
- innovation
- capital expenditures
As well, the Government of Canada provides in-kind contributions, for
example, access to facilities, video teleconferencing equipment, training
and personnel interchanges.
About voluntary sector financing
The voluntary sector draws its support from a variety of sources, including:
- $5 billion from financial and/or in-kind donations from Canadians
- millions of people who volunteer their expertise and labour
- governments, foundations, charitable funding organizations and
corporations
- funds raised by voluntary sector organizations through service
fees, product sales, investment income and other charitable fund-raising
activities
B. More good practices for the Government of Canada and
the voluntary sector
Following are some good practices for each sector (Government of Canada
= GC; voluntary sector = VS) pulled from the Code. For a complete list
of the Code’s good practices, go to the VSI web site:
www.vsi-isbc.ca
|
|
Couldn't be better |
Needs
Improve-ment |
Starting from scratch |
Doesn't apply |
Valuing the voluntary
sector:
GC: provide opportunities
for voluntary sector organizations to access contracts (for example,
by developing service registries of organizations with a particular
expertise)
VS: demonstrate and communicate value
in the delivery of programs and services |
|
|
|
|
Strengthened sustainable
capacity:
GC: use multi-year funding agreements
to enhance organizations’ stability and capacity for long-term
planning
VS:
- invest in organizational and human resource development management
- explore the use of multi-year funding agreements
- include infrastructure costs (e.g., facilities, information
technology) in budgets
|
|
|
|
|
Co-operation and collaboration:
GC: solicit voluntary sector views on better
ways to meet new or existing needs through funding programs
VS: make programs more responsive to
local needs |
|
|
|
|
| Innovation:
GC: identify emerging issues related
to funding policies and practices, and use new funding approaches
to address community needs
VS: identify innovative funding practices
for delivering current programs
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity and equitable
access:
GC: make funded programs more accessible to
groups that typically face challenges by making information available,
writing applications in plain language and eliminating barriers
in eligibility criteria and funding practices
VS: ensure equality of opportunity
in employment practices and service delivery |
|
|
|
|
Accountability:
GC: make application and accountability standards
and practices flexible enough to accommodate a variety of approaches
and the limited capacity of smaller organizations
VS: provide effective board governance |
|
|
|
|
Transparency and consistency:
GC: clearly state the objectives of
funding programs and their eligibility criteria and ensure that
application forms are understandable and concise
VS: co-operate with external funding
reviews, including monitoring, evaluation and/or audit |
|
|
|
|
Efficiency and effectiveness:
GC: speed up the application process
by developing less complex and shorter agreements for lower-cost,
lower-risk projects
VS: work with government to simplify
forms and reporting requirements |
|
|
|
|
Ask yourself …
- What are you doing now to put these good practices into action?
- How can you build on these activities?
- Are there any barriers to moving forward and, if so, what can you
do to overcome them?
- For each of the above areas, what other good practices can you
put in place to strengthen and simplify funding practices?
Some tools to work with …
More about accountability…
… for voluntary sector organizations
Effective governance and accountability begin at home. For voluntary
sector organizations, this means ensuring that you have the appropriate
processes and structures in place to direct and manage your operations
and activities, and ensure that they function well. Effective board
governance involves, among other things*:
Think about:
- how your organization rates on accountability
- whether your current governance/accountability regime
is affecting your funding relationships
- what structures and processes your organization needs
to bring it up to scratch
|
- steering toward the organization’s mission and guiding strategic
planning
- being transparent, including communicating to members, stakeholders
and the public and making information available on request
- developing appropriate structures
- ensuring the board understands its role and avoids conflicts of
interest
- maintaining fiscal responsibility
- ensuring that an effective management team is in place and overseeing
its activities
- implementing assessment and control systems
- planning for the succession and diversity of the board
… for Government of Canada departments and agencies
Think about how you and your organization can accommodate the varying
needs, practices and capabilities of voluntary sector organizations
and, at the same time, be accountable for public money, for example,
by:
- taking into account monitoring procedures already agreed to by a
voluntary sector organization’s other funders, as well as any
quality assurance system introduced by the organization, when discussing
the content, quality and format of Government of Canada information
needs
- agreeing on well-defined measurable results and clear roles and
responsibilities
- recognizing and respecting the different ways that community groups
can manage their resources and still meet accountability requirements
Consider this …
Almost every facet of Canadian life is affected in some way by the
Government of Canada. In addition to providing essential services such
as national security, environmental protection, maintaining national
parks and providing transportation services, the federal government
contributes to the development of Canadian and global economies, and
sustains relations with other countries and organizations around the
world.
In carrying out these diverse roles, the Government of Canada provides
direct and indirect support to programs and services delivered by voluntary
sector organizations. For example, in 1997-98, the government made about
$2.2 billion in direct payments to voluntary sector organizations and
provided $1.5 billion in indirect support to the voluntary sector through
personal and corporate tax credits for charitable donations and GST
rebates available to non-profit organizations. In addition, tax assistance
is provided through the sales tax rebates to charities and the benefits
associated with their tax-exempt status.
If you work in a voluntary sector organization that receives
Government of Canada funding, think about how you can simplify the processes
for funding by, for example:
- collaborating with other voluntary sector organizations to share
innovative funding approaches
- working with government funders to identify innovative funding
approaches and develop user-friendly forms and reporting requirements
If you work in a federal government department or agency
that provides funding to the voluntary sector, think about how you can
simplify the processes for funding by, for example:
- identifying “boiler plate” information that applies
to more than one program
- developing harmonized processes within/across departments to facilitate
joint funding when several programs/departments are working collaboratively
with a common client
- ensuring minimum duplication and requiring only essential information
- making information on funding processes readily available
- engaging the voluntary sector in discussions about innovative approaches
and tools
- providing sector organizations with access to useful planning tools
* Adapted from "Building
on Strength: Improving Governance and Accountability in Canada's Voluntary
Sector (February, 1999)